All Episodes
Displaying 21 - 40 of 369 in total
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the Hobbs Act, which authorizes a “party aggrieved” by an agency’s “final order” to petition for review in a court of appeals, allows nonpar...
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, No. 23-1141 [Arg: 3.4.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States is the proximate cause of alleged injuries to the Mexican government stemming from ...
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, No. 23-1259 [Arg: 3.3.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amen...
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., No. 23-1201 [Arg: 3.3.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether plaintiffs must prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sov...
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 [Arg: 2.26.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether, in addition to pleading the other elements of an employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a majorit...
Perttu v. Richards, No. 23-1324 [Arg: 2.25.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether, in cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative ...
Esteras v. U.S., No. 23-7483 [Arg: 2.25.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether, even though Congress excluded 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) from 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)’s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised rel...
Gutierrez v. Saenz, No. 23-7809 [Arg: 2.24.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether Article III standing requires a particularized determination of whether a specific state official will redress the plaintiff’s injury by fol...
Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or fa...
Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment.
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telepho...
Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where...
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ acce...
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal R...
Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTEDWhether 18 U.S.C. § 1014, which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agenci...
Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits...
Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that origina...
TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:- Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment.
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legall...
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over whic...
