Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C), or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text.
![Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025]](https://img.transistor.fm/O9QbPzhRBQFy8lQgb3tZmD35eBYkhMfxyO7H1eQtQXo/rs:fill:800:800:1/q:60/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83M2Y1/NDljMmY5MjAwYTUz/ZGRmNDg5YTViMjVh/OTI4Ny5wbmc.webp)