McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
![McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025]](https://img.transistor.fm/sllywIhLQ4J7Wy6lFJINsLJsdST5av6IQn19BLhgeWU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:800/h:800/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS83M2Y1/NDljMmY5MjAwYTUz/ZGRmNDg5YTViMjVh/OTI4Ny5wbmc.webp)