Republic of Hungary v. Simon, No. 23-867 [Arg: 12.3.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether historical commingling of assets suffices to establish that proceeds of seized property have a commercial nexus with the United States under the expropriation exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act;
- whether a plaintiff must make out a valid claim that an exception to the FSIA applies at the pleading stage, rather than merely raising a plausible inference; and
- whether a sovereign defendant bears the burden of producing evidence to affirmatively disprove that the proceeds of property taken in violation of international law have a commercial nexus with the United States under the expropriation exception to the FSIA.
![Republic of Hungary v. Simon, No. 23-867 [Arg: 12.3.2024]](https://img.transistor.fm/SasiyiLz8QxdpLekTW2x6YKnJ3vHBri9TNJeVcRhCSo/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:800/h:800/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80ZDIx/Mzc2MDk1MzdjNWUw/OWFlMjcwYzVhNGZl/MWY4NC5wbmc.webp)