Culley v. Marshall, No. 22-585 [Arg: 10.30.2023]

Question Presented:

Issue(s): Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. Wingo or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. Eldridge.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Culley v. Marshall, No. 22-585 [Arg: 10.30.2023]
Broadcast by