National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, No. 22-842 [Arg: 3.18.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Amendment allows a government regulator to threaten regulated entities with adverse regulatory actions if they do business with a controversial speaker, as a consequence of (a) the government’s own hostility to the speaker’s viewpoint or (b) a perceived “general backlash” against the speaker’s advocacy.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
![National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, No. 22-842 [Arg: 3.18.2024]](https://img.transistor.fm/E4cZrzvTOMYN1esCZSA3dFm9l7FVufca0F8G8YqKOOo/rs:fill:800:800:1/q:60/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE4MDc3MzAv/MTcxMTI5NzQyMS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.webp)