Garland v. Cargill, No. 22-976 [Arg: 2.28.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b) because it is designed and intended for use in converting a rifle into a machinegun, i.e., into a weapon that fires “automatically more than one shot ... by a single function of the trigger.”
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b) because it is designed and intended for use in converting a rifle into a machinegun, i.e., into a weapon that fires “automatically more than one shot ... by a single function of the trigger.”
![Garland v. Cargill, No. 22-976 [Arg: 2.28.2024]](https://img.transistor.fm/PwatTYul62Ep3bWEc89hxbvdInlidgvWr3SbIgoFLsg/rs:fill:800:800:1/q:60/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzE4MDc3Mjcv/MTcxMTI5NjEzMC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.webp)