Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, No. 22-166 [Arg: 04.26.2023]
Issue(s): (1) Whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Fifth Amendment's takings clause; and (2) whether the forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt, plus interest, penalties, and costs, is a fine within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
![Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, No. 22-166 [Arg: 04.26.2023]](https://img.transistor.fm/m1Kzdx9UfDqIlY2mJLJEulvCLSLfDeOL2LIeEQShKH0/rs:fill:800:800:1/q:60/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzEzMTMzOTMv/MTY4MjcwNzIyOS1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.webp)