Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436 [Arg: 1.17.2023]
Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly determined that 8 U.S.C. 1252(d)(1) prevented the court from reviewing petitioner's claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals engaged in impermissible factfinding because petitioner had not exhausted that claim through a motion to reconsider.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
![Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436 [Arg: 1.17.2023]](https://img.transistor.fm/13SjvoYp3MnM29UcnDTA8anme1j2O9TRrU7A9CWMd34/rs:fill:800:800:1/q:60/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzEyMTg5OTEv/MTY3NzEyOTQyMy1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.webp)