Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436 [Arg: 1.17.2023]
Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly determined that 8 U.S.C. 1252(d)(1) prevented the court from reviewing petitioner's claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals engaged in impermissible factfinding because petitioner had not exhausted that claim through a motion to reconsider.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
![Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436 [Arg: 1.17.2023]](https://img.transistor.fm/b4EUMEiwii0D3dQoguVc5oUVGiOFpe1RSmKDr9zm9i8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:800/h:800/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzEyMTg5OTEv/MTY3NzEyOTQyMy1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.webp)