Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436 [Arg: 1.17.2023]

Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly determined that 8 U.S.C. 1252(d)(1) prevented the court from reviewing petitioner's claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals engaged in impermissible factfinding because petitioner had not exhausted that claim through a motion to reconsider.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436 [Arg: 1.17.2023]
Broadcast by