Percoco v. U.S., No. 21-1158 [Arg: 11.28.2022]
Whether a private citizen who holds no elected office or government employment, but has informal political or other influence over governmental decisionmaking, owes a fiduciary duty to the general public such that he can be convicted of honest-services fraud.
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether a private citizen who holds no elected office or government employment, but has informal political or other influence over governmental decisionmaking, owes a fiduciary duty to the general public such that he can be convicted of honest-services fraud.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Whether a private citizen who holds no elected office or government employment, but has informal political or other influence over governmental decisionmaking, owes a fiduciary duty to the general public such that he can be convicted of honest-services fraud.
![Percoco v. U.S., No. 21-1158 [Arg: 11.28.2022]](https://img.transistor.fm/sLS0jT-5Kj7fI4D2kdPsFB9lZS41iyZJNM30nFRqTTQ/rs:fill:800:800:1/q:60/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lcGlz/b2RlLzExMjQyMDAv/MTY3MDMzMjg2OC1h/cnR3b3JrLmpwZw.webp)