Consolidated Case: 19-108 UNITED STATES V. BRIGGS and 19-184 UNITED STATES V. COLLINS (2020-Oct-13)

QUESTION PRESENTED: 1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces erred in concluding-contrary to its own longstanding precedent-that the Uniform Code of Military Justice allows prosecution of a rape that occurred between 1986 and 2006 only if it was discovered and charged within five years. SUPPORT what we are doing here by contributing to our Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/supremecourt
19-108 UNITED STATES V. BRIGGS
DECISION BELOW: 78 M.J. 289 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 16-0711

QUESTION PRESENTED:

1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces erred in concluding-contrary to its own longstanding precedent-that the Uniform Code of Military Justice allows prosecution of a rape that occurred between 1986 and 2006 only if it was discovered and charged within five years.


19-184 UNITED STATES V. COLLINS
DECISION BELOW: 78 M.J. 415 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 19-0052

QUESTION PRESENTED:

1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces erred in concluding-contrary to its own longstanding precedent-that the Uniform Code of Military Justice allows prosecution of a rape that occurred between 1986 and 2006 only if it was discovered and charged within five years.

SUPPORT what we are doing here by contributing to our Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/supremecourt
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Consolidated Case:  19-108 UNITED STATES V. BRIGGS and 19-184 UNITED STATES V. COLLINS (2020-Oct-13)
Broadcast by