Case: 17-1268 Opati v. Republic of Sudan (2020-Feb-24)

QUESTION PRESENTED:  The questions presented are: Whether a party which knowingly and intentionally twice defaults, acts to delay and not in good faith, and affirmatively elects not to contest a nonjurisdictional legal issue before judgment may nevertheless demonstrate "extraordinary" and "exceptional" circumstances warranting appellate review of the forfeited nonjurisdictional legal issue post-judgment.  Whether, consistent with this Court's decision in Republic of Austria v. Altmann,  541 U.S. 677 (2004), the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act applies retroactively; thereby permitting recovery of punitive damages under 28 U.S.C. § l605A(c) against foreign states for terrorist activities occurring prior to the passage of the current version of the statute. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/scotus/support

QUESTION PRESENTED: 

The questions presented are:

  1. Whether a party which knowingly and intentionally twice defaults, acts to delay and not in good faith, and affirmatively elects not to contest a nonjurisdictional legal issue before judgment may nevertheless demonstrate "extraordinary" and "exceptional" circumstances warranting appellate review of the forfeited nonjurisdictional legal issue post-judgment. 
  2. Whether, consistent with this Court's decision in Republic of Austria v. Altmann,  541 U.S. 677 (2004), the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act applies retroactively; thereby permitting recovery of punitive damages under 28 U.S.C. § l605A(c) against foreign states for terrorist activities occurring prior to the passage of the current version of the statute.
--- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/scotus/support ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Case: 17-1268 Opati v. Republic of Sudan (2020-Feb-24)
Broadcast by