All Episodes
Displaying 181 - 200 of 369 in total
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 21-454 [Arg: 10.3.2022]
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit set forth the proper test for determining whether wetlands are "waters of the United States" under the Clean Wate...
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, No. 21-429 [Arg: 04.27.2022]
Issue(s): Whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
Biden v. Texas, No. 21-954 [Arg: 04.26.2022]
Issue(s): (1) Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1225 requires the Department of Homeland Security to continue implementing the Migrant Protection Protocols, a former policy under...
Shoop v. Twyford, No. 21-511 [Arg: 04.26.2022]
Issue(s): (1) Whether federal courts may use the All Writs Act to order the transportation of state prisoners for reasons not enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c); an...
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, No. 21-418 [Arg: 04.25.2022]
Issue(s): (1) Whether a public-school employee who says a brief, quiet prayer by himself while at school and visible to students is engaged in government speech th...
Nance v. Ward, No. 21-439 [Arg: 04.25.2022]
Issue(s): (1) Whether an inmate’s as-applied method-of-execution challenge must be raised in a habeas petition instead of through a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action if the ...
George v. McDonough, No. 21-234 [Arg: 04.19.2022]
Issue(s): Whether, when the Department of Veterans Affairs denies a veteran’s claim for benefits in reliance on an agency interpretation that is later deemed invalid u...
Kemp v. U.S., No. 21-5726 [Arg: 04.19.2022]
Issue(s): Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) authorizes relief based on a district court’s error of law.
U.S. v. Washington, No. 21-404 [Arg: 04.18.2022]
Issue(s): Whether a state workers’ compensation law that applies exclusively to federal contract workers who perform services at a specified federal facility is barred...
Siegel v. Fitzgerald, No. 21-441 [Arg: 04.18.2022]
Issue(s): Whether the Bankruptcy Judgeship Act violates the uniformity requirement of the Constitution's bankruptcy clause by increasing quarterly fees solely in distr...
Viking River Cruises v. Moriana, No. 20-1573 [Arg: 03.30.2022]
Issue(s): Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot raise representative claims, ...
Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, No. 20-603 [Arg: 03.29.2022]
Issue(s): Whether Congress has the power to authorize suits against nonconsenting states pursuant to its constitutional war powers.
LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, No. 20-807 [Arg: 03.28.2022]
Issue(s): Whether a locomotive is in use on a railroad’s line and subject to the Locomotive Inspection Act and its safety regulations when its train makes a temporary ...
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, No. 21-309 [Arg: 03.28.2022]
Issue(s): Whether workers who load or unload goods from vehicles that travel in interstate commerce, but do not physically transport such goods themselves, are interst...
ZF Automotive US v. Luxshare, Ltd., No. 21-401 [Arg: 03.23.2022]
Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a), which permits litigants to invoke the authority of United States courts to render assistance in gathering evidence for use in “a foreign o...
Golan v. Saada, No. 20-1034 [Arg: 03.22.2022]
Issue(s): Whether, upon finding that return to the country of habitual residence places a child at grave risk, a district court is required to consider ameliorative me...
Morgan v. Sundance, No. 21-328 [Arg: 03.21.2022]
Issue(s): Whether the arbitration-specific requirement that the proponent of a contractual waiver defense prove prejudice violates the Supreme Court’s instruction in A...
Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 21-248 [Arg: 03.21.2022]
1) Whether a state agent authorized by state law to defend the state’s interest in litigation must overcome a presumption of adequate representation to intervene as of...
Egbert v. Boule, No. 21-147 [Arg: 03.02.2022]
1) Whether a cause of action exists under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics for First Amendment retaliation claims; and (2) whether a c...
Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. Davita, No. 20-1641 [Arg: 03.1.2022]
(1) Whether a group health plan that provides uniform reimbursement of all dialysis treatments observe the prohibition provided by the Medicare Secondary Payer Act tha...
