Case: 18-938 Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (2019-Nov-13)

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an order denying a motion for relief from the automatic stay is a final order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1). In diverting from this Court's prior precedent, and in conflict with the First and Third Circuit Courts of Appeal, the Sixth Circuit ruled that an order denying relief from the automatic stay is per se final. Argument Transcript: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-938_k536.pdf --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/scotus/support

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether an order denying a motion for relief from the automatic stay is a final order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1). In diverting from this Court's prior precedent, and in conflict with the First and Third Circuit Courts of Appeal, the Sixth Circuit ruled that an order denying relief from the automatic stay is per se final.

Argument Transcript: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-938_k536.pdf

--- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/scotus/support

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Case: 18-938 Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (2019-Nov-13)
Broadcast by